The Supremes and Personal Attacks — What Happened to Dignity?

By Elayne Savage, PhD

 

EmptyChair

What a shame recent history-making decisions by the Supreme Court are being tainted by animosity between the justices.

Will they ever again be able to sit down to tea together? Can they survive the recent rancor and disrespect?

What a contrast between Justice Robert’s restrained, reasoned and respectful dissent of the Marriage Equality decision and the irreverent dissents by Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito – especially the public shaming of Justice Kennedy.     

This blog is not intended to be a political statement. My need to write about this reflects my uneasiness about the disrespect shown by these Justices to each other. As many of you know, I see things through the lens of rejection and taking things personally and these disrespectful exchanges trouble me a lot. Some of you may be affected by this as well, and I hope you'll take part in this conversation.
 
And yes, I guess I am taking it personally that my trust in the dignity of the highest court in our land has been shattered by undignified behavior.

The ‘Diss List”

These written dissents are chock-full of descriptions from the “Diss List” I use as an author and speaker.

“Diss” of course is short for “disrespect,” but there are dozens of words that begin with ‘diss’ including dismissing, discounting, disparaging, disregarding, dishonoring, and disgracing.

Each of these describes a rejecting behavior. They arise from and can lead to taking things personally.

DISS LIST.jpg 00Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito, wrote a blistering dissent calling The Affordable Care Act majority opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts “absurd” and proclaiming, “We should start calling this law SCOTUScare."

Justice Scalia, famous for his over-the-top writing and witticisms, seems to have overstepped this time. Perhaps he isn’t aware that cynicism and sarcasm are anger based — and his anger surely shows.

Do you think Justice Scalia’s insulting responses to the majority opinions could be because he felt betrayed by the usually conservative Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy?

Did he take it personally? Is he overreacting?

Taking Things Personally – Let Me Count the Ways

Taking things personally has lots of colorations:

-  Taking offense at and overreacting to perceived slights.
-  Tending to believe there is intent even if there is not.
-  Taking things the wrong way, or taking things the right way but 
your feelings get easily   hurt.
-  Believing folks are taking sides — for you or against you.
-  Feeling betrayed because you think someone is being disloyal. 
-  Getting upset when other people don't see things the way you do.
-  Feeling unfairly criticized, blamed or disrespected.
-  Feeling slighted or wronged or attacked.
-  Developing hurt feelings and misunderstandings and even resentment.

Politico.com Wrote this Blog for Me!

Just as I was starting to write this blog using vivid examples of sniping and disrespect in the dissents  . . . Politico.com did it for me! (Politico, read by both Democrats and Republicans, is for the most part considered unbiased and a bit edgy.)

Here are some quotes from the Politico piece using words like “bitterness,” “invective,” “ridiculing” and “accusatory.”

The gloves came off, with the justices hurling especially nasty words at each other, shattering the illusion that they are all good friends.

Scalia pulled no punches, blasting the majority decision in the same-sex marriage case as a ‘judicial Putsch,’ and leveling attacks that seemed directed squarely at Justice Anthony Kennedy, who penned the court’s majority opinion.”

(I had no clue what putsch means and had to look it up in Merriam-Webster: “a secretly plotted and suddenly executed attempt to overthrow a government.” Imagine. One Justice accusing another Justice of trying to overthrow the government!)

Scalia called Kennedy’s opinion ‘often profoundly incoherent’ and declared that its ‘style is as pretentious as its content is egotistic.’"

At another juncture, Scalia ridiculed Kennedy’s language as sounding like an aphorism from a fortune cookie.

These mocking words from one justice about another, makes my head spin. Where is the decorum one would hope to expect from Supreme Court Justices?

(You’ll find the link to the thought-provoking Politico article below.)

Isomorphism and Projection

I wonder if this SCOTUS turmoil is a reflection of similar in-fighting in Congress and between Congress and the White House. And is it a mirroring of the polarization in the country? The term for this is isomorphism or parallel process.

Could there be some psychological projection going on as well where one person’s unacceptable thoughts, needs, feelings or fears are unconsciously attributed to others?
(See the link below for more about isomorphism and projection.)

Will this dissension trickle down to the rest of us? Or has it already?

What a shame it would be if this acrimony affects future behaviors of The Supreme Court, Congress, The White House and We the People.

The positive side here is that some recent opinions have included a large dose of humanity from  the Justices. Wouldn't it be refreshing if SCOTUS could each find their way to feel passionately, yet respectfully and with dignity.

Would love your ideas about all this. Let’s have a discussion . . .

© Elayne Savage, PhD

Until next time,

Elayne

More reading:

From Politico.com: Supreme Court Justices Stop Playing Nice
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/supreme-court-justices-antonin-scalia-samuel-alito-119486.html

On Isomorphism and projection:
From TipsFromTheQueenOfRejection: Nasty and Personal: When is Political Nastiness Psychological Projection?
http://bit.ly/1GH3ZDB

Elayne Savage is the author of ground-breaking relationship books published in 9 languages.

Both books are now available on Kindle!



To order DON'T TAKE IT PERSONALLY! THE ART OF DEALING WITH REJECTION

To order BREATHING ROOM — CREATING SPACE TO BE A COUPLE

REPRINTING THESE e-LETTERS
You can use the articles in 'Tips from The Queen of Rejection'® as long as you include an attribution and, whenever possible, a live link to my website. I'd appreciate if you'd notify me where and when the material will appear.

The attribution should include this information: Elayne Savage, PhD is a communication coach, keynote speaker, and trainer, practicing psychotherapist and author of Don't Take It Personally! The Art of Dealing with Rejection and Breathing Room – Creating Space to Be a Couple.

To find out more about my speaking programs, coaching and consultation services visit: //www.QueenofRejection.com or call 510-540-6230 if you or your group can benefit.

Contacting Elayne
I welcome your feedback as well as suggestions for topics you'd like to see addressed in this e-letter.
Here's how you can reach me:
510-540-6230
www.QueenofRejection.com

For more communication and rejection tips, you can follow me:
Twitter@ElayneSavage
LinkedIn.com/in/elaynesavage
Facebook.com/elayne.savage

 


Reposting Rules

You can reprint any blog from ‘Tips from The Queen of Rejection’® as long as you include an attribution and, whenever possible, a live link to my website. 

And I’d really appreciate if you’d notify me where and when the material will appear. 


Comments

8 responses to “The Supremes and Personal Attacks — What Happened to Dignity?”

  1. What Scalia wrote, aside from entertainment value, was disgraceful.
    Sad and ugly . . .
    Thanks for pointing out the differences in how the dissents were written – regarding Justice John Robert’s use of restraint as compared to the personal attacks of other Justices.

  2. Well done, Elayne ~
    Is that the chair where you were often asked to sit in the corner 😉

  3. Aliyah Stein

    This is very good, Elayne.
    It gives a different perspective on the news of the Supreme Court decisions –
    like adding a side-bar to the news story!

  4. Dear Elayne:
     
    Are you kidding about Chief Justice Roberts?
    My reaction was because the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court referred to all five a Justices who voted in favor of marriage equality as LAWYERS.
    They may have been lawyers, but that title was removed once they became judges and that title was removed when they became Justices.  How much more disrespectful could he have been to those five Justices, than referring to them as no more than lawyers.  
    That would be bad enough coming from another Justice, but he is the Chief Justice.
    Chief Lawyer Roberts, that is your biased opinion based upon your twisted thought process as a result of your accepting your interpretation of scripture as fact.  The problem in accepting fiction as fact on blind faith is that it skews your overall thought process.  Such people don’t belong on the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Lawyer Roberts.”
     
    Barack Obama caused a huge controversy with Conservatives by stating that ‘the ability to empathize with others is and ought to be, a key criterion for nomination to the nation’s federal courts.’ 
    http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/daughters.pdf
     
    Conservatives thought being empathic makes judges biased.  However, in reality, the reverse is true.  The most biased judges are those lacking the ability to empathize with others.
     
    In each of their dissents to the marriage equality decision, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito all demonstrated very clearly, how biased judges are when they lack the ability to empathize with others.  This is reflected not in their dissents alone, but the things they said in their dissents.  History will not look kindly on any of them.
     
    Allow me to share a post where I made this point in my article titled ‘The Power of Empathy.’ 
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-baer/the-development-of empath_b_6281800.html
     And a piece by Episcopal priest, Nathaniel Katz:
    “An Open Letter to the Hon. John Roberts”
     http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7688574
     
    Mark B. Baer, Esq.
    Family Law Attorney/Mediator/Collaborative Law Practitioner/
    Author/Lecturer/Keynote Speaker/Legal Analyst

  5. Glad you recognize the perspective i was trying to show regarding the indications of disrespect and in-fighting on the Supreme Court.
    -Elayne

  6. Yep – I spent a lot of time in the corner!

  7. Wow. Thanks Mark for pointing out Justice Roberts’ “Lawyer” comment. I had missed that.
    So I went back and read his Dissent and saw he not only referred to the 5 Justices as “lawyers” once — but he did it twice!
    Yes, I can certainly see how this appears disrespectful – especially to an attorney.
    I still think Justice Roberts’ referring to the 5 Justices as “lawyers” is less disgraceful then Justice Scalia’s various personal attacks on Justice Kennedy and Justice Roberts.
    – Elayne

  8. I love your message. Very impressive
    Hi Elayne,
    I’ve been following you for a bit and love the message you share. You are doing a great work, and I just wanted to let you know it touched me. Being a positive influence is hard work.
    Thanks for committing yourself to it!

Leave a Reply to Aliyah Stein Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Elayne Savage is the author of ground-breaking relationship books published in 9 languages.


To find out more about Elayne’s speaking programs, coaching and consultation services visit www.QueenofRejection.com or call 510-540-6230 if you or your group can benefit. 

Book cover for Don't Take It Personally! The Art of Dealing with Rejection by Elayne Savage, Ph.D.

Don’t Take It Personally: The Art of Dealing with Rejection

Wouldn’t it be great to not be so sensitive to words, looks, or tones of voice? This thoughtful, good-humored book explores the many forms of rejection and how to overcome the fear of it. Learn dependable tools for stepping back from these overwhelming feelings.

Book cover for Breathing Room by Elayne Savage, Ph.D.

Breathing Room: Creating Space to Be a Couple

Expectations and disappointments, style differences, and hidden agendas lead to misunderstandings and hurt feelings. Before you know it, anger and resentment build up, taking up all the space. You’ll learn how to make room for the respect and connection you hope for.